In the twelve years or so that I have been observing earth motions on my home built seismograph I have been puzzled by the occasional appearance of noisiness in the seismometer trace. I have read about these microseisms and tried unsuccessfully to identify a source of them. The literature always identifies storms at sea as the main cause but I discounted that explanation because of my location in Ohio and the fact that I don’t have a professional, broadband seismometer. So I looked at local wind speeds and wind gusts buffeting the house or moving the trees so much that their roots move. I have looked at local barometric pressure and temperature changes even monitoring the temperature inside the enclosure which contains my seismometer. I have wondered whether there is something in my amplifier electronics that might explain these tiny signals. Nothing worked out.
Earlier this month, I noticed that they were back and that they were growing quite strong. Then it occurred to me that Hurricane Matthew was approaching the east coast of Florida at the same time. Maybe the microseisms I see can be attributed to storms at sea!
I began a closer look at this by downloading time series data about the hurricane from the National Hurricane Center ftp site. I wrote a python script to load the data from the downloaded file and plot the track of Hurricane Matthew and other information I thought might be important such as the maximum sustained wind, central pressure, and the distance of the eye from my home in Millersburg, Ohio which I calculated from the location data.
I also downloaded a bundle of specialized microseism analysis tools from the IRIS (Incorporated Research Institutes for Seismology) software site. This software is designed for advanced study using professional grade, broadband, multi-channel seismographs. As such, I have most likely not applied it correctly, in fact bypassed important calculations, etc. Having said that I hope that the “relative” analysis I did shows some direction toward a qualitative relationships between storms at sea and the microseisms I see recorded on my seismograph. Here is what I found.
This data includes Local, Secondary, and Primary Microseism energy. I chose to use the Primary band data since they all show similar qualitative response. Hurricane Matthew dissipated on Oct 10 and the NHC data file was closed and no more data was added. More on that later. I snipped the microseism graph off at Oct 10 and compared to the Hurricane central pressure and distance to the eye:
This is a little hard to visualize in part because one would think that the microseism energy might be inversely related to both the distance and the central pressure. We can look at the same information taking this into account by plotting the reciprocal of both quantities:
The last chart is the closest to correlated data that I have seen in twelve years or so of trying to figure this out. Not perfect due to many known and unknown reasons but something for me now to be aware of when I see this noisiness show up.
The proximity of the storm seems predominant. The central pressure seems to lead the microseism energy. And finally, the original microseism graphs that went out to Oct 13 showed the noise staying high long after the NHC downgraded the storm. Presumably, the ocean does not calm immediately after the storm dissipates. An unmentioned complication in this study is that Hurricane Nicole was also present and strengthening during this time period further out in the Atlantic.
Impressive work, Mic. Now, you will have a bit of homework every time a strong storm get close ! I wish you a clean and neat correlation. Have a good day.
Thank you, Gilles. Homework…what more could I ask for? Pure enjoyment! Best wishes to you.
Stopped by to see if you had NZ posted – found this article quite interesting, Nice work!
I haven’t been to quick to post individual earthquakes since I updated the ‘Live’ seismograph page. At one point I think there were five annotated earthquakes on it and obviously the main event had an impressive signal.
As far as this article, it was a project. There are obviously lots of other things going on too. It is pretty noisy right now with no hurricanes approaching. So I’m looking at storms on the Great Lakes too but with no promising results. Thanks, Dave.
Cue Gordon Lightfoot….
Seriously! Have you ever seen this set of photos?: https://www.lensculture.com/search/projects?fallback=not-found&q=lake%2Berie&modal=project-275689-liquid-mountains-of-lake-erie
I’ve seen a couple of them excerpted out – but never the whole collection. Quite impressive! I was not making light of the idea – I know that your research ideas are usually well thought-out.
Oh, I didn’t take it that way…I was agreeing with you.